Ironically, while the US is locked in a global struggle for influence with China, it is China that was better prepared for the war in Iran — the war the US itself started. China's energy system is more resilient against a prolonged conflict in the Middle East, its businesses are the main beneficiaries of the conflict, and the conflict is improving China's reputation as a more stable international partner for trade and investment than the US.
First, China's economy is more resilient to a prolonged conflict in the Middle East than any other major economy. The main reason is the structure of its energy system. As we wrote several weeks ago, China's vision of energy security — a mix of nuclear and renewables, with coal serving as a bridge — is more resilient than the US system, in which oil and gas account for 72% of total energy supply. China also reportedly holds twice as many emergency oil reserves: 1.13 billion barrels compared to 415 million for the US.
Second, China's businesses are the leading producers of the technologies that benefit most from this conflict. In many countries, yet another international conflict driving up oil and gas prices has sparked renewed demand for renewable energy technologies such as solar panels, heat pumps, and batteries — all industries in which China is the world leader. Electric vehicles, another area of Chinese dominance, are also gaining in popularity as a result.
Third, under the second Trump administration, China is rapidly becoming a more stable and predictable international partner than the US. European leaders were already working to improve relations with Beijing before this conflict began. Global investors, meanwhile, are increasingly viewing Chinese government bonds as a relatively stable safe haven. Notably, Iran is reportedly demanding payment in Chinese renminbi from ships seeking passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
Most importantly, even if the US manages to prevent a full economic collapse in the coming weeks — as we warned last week remains a real risk — the dynamic described above is unlikely to reverse. In all three dimensions, this conflict is likely to remain a positive force for China's long-term development.
